AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Auckland casino v casino control authority12/22/2023 ![]() The notice given Mr Wu was in the following form:ġ7 Albert Street, 11th Floor, Auckland City (2) The provisions of subsection (1) of this section are in addition to, and not in derogation from, the Trespass Act 1982. (1) The fact that a casino is licensed under this Act shall not entitle any person to enter or to remain on the casino premises as against the holder of the casino premises licence or the casino operator's licence and, subject to any right conferred by or under any other Act, every person shall leave the casino premises when required to do so by or on behalf of the holder of the licence. The section reads:Ħ7 Entry to and exclusion of entry from casino ![]() ![]() The appeal concerns the interpretation of s67 of the Casino Control Act 1990 (the Act) against the background of the common law which underlies that section. This is an appeal from a judgment of Chambers J in the High Court at Auckland on 13 February 2002 granting the respondent, Mr Wu, an interlocutory injunction restraining the appellant operators of the Sky City Casino (Sky City) from preventing him under a banning notice dated 18 February 2001 for a period of two years from entering the casino or using its facilities. ![]()
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |